differences over learning;

I wandered all through my thought process to put up in a simplest version for dogma’s to the most complex version of DIFFERENCES that exist within the society. But, what makes me wonder is not the conception I have grown with and behold with it but, to put the so simple version into abstract to what I feel and got to go through with.

Well! I m not talking about the dogma’s of the social evils revolving over every other group of socialites. I m not fully satisfied to depend upon the ‘differences’ gained from and within the womb, rather I m worried about the ‘factual conceptions’ formed over the growth period to forcibly accept the existing differences and form a more valid ‘difference of intellect’. Intellect where I quote comes into light, a significance of urge, an instinct to define the level of attainment of parity, either from the so above all ‘classes’ or to just rise above the level of so within existing ‘classes’.

The word ‘class’ in itself is self privileged with the ‘Marxian’ conception to put the light upon the monetary or the economic strata of lifestyle upon which I’m focusing my dialogues. The incident is not new for me from the past 2 months but, the idea of development which I expect is somehow shattered. I m referring to one such incident in which made me realize that although, ‘a poor man is the happiest man, but the most desiring manhood’ I see through. The desires and the unending desires are not one of those for money or land, differences are not existing for a cause of gender or class or caste, neither even the adult individual is felt describing the differences I felt. It is rather the little and few caused upon between the ‘little clad’ to not let the other so learning with the same pace.

What exactly I wonder is of the consequences of not let to grow and grow self. End? Don’t know where it will. Supposition to come out of the act so being performed in society probably can be jealousy or one is just concerned with the self to grow to the fullest and above all. If I stick myself to the latter part, it would not be wrong in putting human into Hobbes conception of human. All I’m in the end stuck up to that, what makes that so human growing under the parity of ‘daily bread’ earning or eating to be so self-centered at ‘her’ ends?

Is it the saturation they have engulfed from the limited source of learning available to them, which undoubtedly is the last and final appeal from them to earn above of what they get to sustain, provided apart from the ‘labor exploitation’ often done.  Saturation itself can be also of the instinct of urge to just land up above from the base to a high expectations from the sources they get and they avail indeed.

The question of resources when arises is just to be considered as a part of limitation as the ‘pre-existing’ differences don’t allow the counterparts to avail them. The flow of learning is broken and just the “elite’’ over here who is blessed with the tag of what she has own the ‘privilege’ of and forces the existing forces to make it rigid and sustainable for within the circumference of her learning.

Flow of resources never stops, rather it increases with the options being rejected from the class above the statistic data of the community I m concerned with. Rejection runs directly as a fashion for the latter to be accepted without questioning the revival. So where does the gap arises that produce the few (of already underprivileged) to just rise at parity and other from same to be rather left behind for exploitation? And mind it, both were blessed with resources, although of rejection but, resources indeed.

I would not mind stating my views in limitations of my abstract experiences that the saturation in itself has made the human existence of such class that the emblem of ‘jealousy’ has overpowered the humaneness to grow under learning with being envious. Debate would not sum up as the flow of obstruction to, “grow with let grow” is still seen prevailing.

Thus the source (I) available as making learn also gets deflected to be a prejudice in judgment and just make learn. Where the obstruction will be broken in future aspects is obviously haunted but, I wish I could make it predictable in the boundaries of ‘diversity’ overhead of human, ruled by ‘differences (of ?)’.